Gilles Simon: “Three times I have lost in five‑set matches against three good players” - UBITENNIS
Connect with us

ATP

Gilles Simon: “Three times I have lost in five‑set matches against three good players”

Published

on

TENNIS 2014 ROLAND GARROS – 30th of May 2014. M. Raonic d. G. Simon 4-6, 6-3, 2-6, 6-2, 7-5. An interview with Gilles Simon

Q. Good evening. After Wawrinka, Federer, Raonic in five sets, now are you cursed here on the courts?

GILLES SIMON: I love your questions so much. Are we talking about the five sets I won? No? Yeah?

I don’t think I have lost more matches in five sets than I have won here. But that’s true, three times I have lost in five set matches against three good players, Wawrinka, Federer, and Raonic.

So this is a bitter loss, a tough loss, a five set defeat. You know, it was easier to be defeated, what was it, in 2010 against Soderling in three sets? You know, it was the round of 16. He defeated me strongly. It’s easier to swallow.

But now, you know, I like this thing, you know, being cursed. A five setter match is a curse.

No, I have won several five set matches. I don’t feel I’m cursed here.

 

Q. Now, on this match this evening you’re bitter probably because during the five sets you came back at the last moment, and then you fell down again. This is when it really turned around.

GILLES SIMON: Well, yeah. For a five set match, you know, the lessons you remember are the games, the points at the end of the match. But maybe if there is something I did wrong it was not during the fifth set, it was before.

The fifth set was tougher for me because the more you play against these players and the less you play, the more you play badly; therefore the more difficult it is for you to give the good shots.

Therefore, when I had two positive dynamics in the match, then he came back into the match and it was silly of me.

The first time my serve game was not good; I broke back against him. I thought, It’s going to be okay, but then in the fourth I had just finished really well and then I was like a phantom. I gave him a break game.

Each time I couldn’t really bother him. He was having no doubts. During the fifth set I think he was taking control. He was playing a lot better. If I regret something, it’s not during the fifth set. If I have one regret, it’s to finish when it’s nighttime.

You won’t see anything. You always have this impression that it’s a bad thing, a bad moment. Should you stop the moment and it’s 5 5, during the fifth set? You don’t want to stop if it’s 5 All.

Or should I continue? I was thinking about this. We couldn’t see anything. It’s 9:30. You can’t play at 9:30 at night.

So that’s true. At the end of the match it was difficult. I don’t think though that this was the turnaround point. This is not when I made silly things today.

 

Q. There was a big match against Nadal in Rome; a big match again today. So are you very satisfied because you’re now back on the right tracks, or would you say you’re more frustrated today because you couldn’t open this door, which is only slightly open?

GILLES SIMON: No, I’m very disappointed. You know, and today I’d say this match has nothing to do with the match against Nadal. Sorry.

But today, well, you know, again, we’re not in tennistic geniuses. It’s two or three points. It’s either out or just in, in the corner, not enough rhythm, and you always have the impression that it’s    well, but it never reaches hilltops, if I can say.

It’s a different intensity, different atmosphere. And then the public was incredible, because there were moments when they feel it’s almost there. But then you feel it’s, you know, this thing, this moment.

And then when you play against Rafa it’s all the time, all the time. It’s each point. It’s, Wow. It’s going to be tense. That’s it.

Well, for me, on the court, and even though the atmosphere is incredible in terms of, you know, my pleasure, enjoying it, and so far from Rome.

Well, we know it, and that’s what’s good about this sport, that we have different profiles, we have different players to play against.

And therefore you have to use other skills and other qualities, as well. Today I’m a bit disappointed, because I thought I could have done better than that again.

I could have made this easier for me. But each time I was up, he managed to come back. During the second one, the fourth one, as well, immediately he didn’t have to think too much.

Therefore, at the end of the day, it wasn’t a good management of the match as far as I’m concerned from A to Z.

 

Q. Would you say that Milos has improved from the baseline? Would you say you felt this and that the other players feel this way as well?

GILLES SIMON: Personally, I don’t know anything about the other players. I can’t say anything about them or what they think. But for me, no, not really. Not frankly, no.

No. You know, well, he’s got his own game patterns. He knows what he wants to do. A few shots he does really well. You know, his strengths, his strength is that he brings you into his game pattern.

But then when he tries things, sometimes it’s so odd, so strange. You know, a dropshot that bounces into the net, that’s strange.

You know, well, again, you can’t ask a player like Milos, given his size, to have the touch, the timing of a smaller, a tinier player. That’s his strength. His strength is his serve. You know, 15 degrees and it’s always 220, 220 all the time. Five hours, 220 always. On you. Ceaselessly.

You know his strength, which is incredible, which is at the end of the day, with the tennis, which is so random sometimes, he has the strength in him to play the right shot at the right moment.

You know, most players you play against on the tour, they can win eight times out of ten. But Milos is the contrary. Look at his backhand. Not many good shots, and when it’s very important it’s a passing shot after running. Oh, shit, you know.

This is quite puzzling. You don’t know how to react, because this is what he does. It’s his habit. I look at the match in a more general way. I have the impression I have to win, you know, to have more points.

But he is seizing each opportunity at the moment. If there is a break point, he hits it and he wins it. And then afterwards, he can have ten points out. He doesn’t care, because he managed to do the break point at the right moment.

I’d like to have this strength. That’s his game style, and that’s why he’s very dangerous.

ATP

Andy Murray Set To Start Injury Comeback In Geneva

Published

on

Three-time Grand Slam champion Andy Murray will return to action later this month at the Geneva Open after being given a wildcard to play at the Swiss event. 

The former world No.1 has been sidelined from the Tour since March after suffering a significant ankle injury whilst playing at the Miami Open. At that tournament, he suffered damage to two ligaments in his left ankle. At the time he was unsure of how long his recovery will take. 

However, in recent days Murray has been seen back on the practice courts ahead of what could potentially be his last clay-court swing before retiring from the sport. There has been a lot of speculation concerning his future after the tennis star said in February that he is ‘likely not going to play’ beyond the summer. Although he is yet to outline his possible retirement plans to the public. 

The Geneva Open will get underway on May 18th which is three days after Murray’s 37th birthday. His decision to play in the tournament for the first time increases the chances of him playing at the French Open for the first time since 2020. The I newspaper recently reported that the Brit could play in just the doubles tournament at Roland Garros to coincide with his hopes of playing in the Paris Olympics later this summer. He is a two-time Olympic champion in singles and also won a silver medal in mixed doubles in 2012. 

So far this season, Murray has won five out of 13 matches played on the Tour. The highest-ranked player he has beaten so far this year was Tomás Martín Etcheverry in Miami. He has won back-to-back matches in only one out of his last eight tournaments played. 

Murray is yet to comment on his decision to play in Geneva which will be his first clay event since May 2023. 

Continue Reading

ATP

Alexander Zverev proves to be too consistent for a wavering Denis Shapovalov

Published

on

Alexander Zverev - Madrid 2024 (photo X @MutuaMadridOpen)

In the last match of the day the No. 5 in the world comfortably seals a 64 75  win and reaches the round of 16 in the Mutua Madrid Open for his seventh time

The Madrid nocturne was poised for entertaining drama when Alexander Zverev and Denis Shapovalov stepped on court at 11 pm. The German looking to emulate his past glorious runs in Madrid, where his name is engraved in the history book as a two-time winner.

And Shapovalov, in his strenuous attempt to retrieve his pre-injury tennis and ranking standards. Let’s not forget he was a Wimbledon semi-finalist in 2021 and a top 10. And let’s not forget aesthetics, the 25-year-old being one of those players endowed with a unique, inimitably stylish leftie game.

Yet the match fell somewhat short of expectations. Too many unforced errors oozing from the Canadian, who was perpetually struggling to hold serve and just as perpetually was unable to pose a threat to Zverev’s, but for a little help in the final stages.

Yes, there were applause-ripping points, plenty enough for editing pleasing highlights, but the match was a lop-sided one, far more than is told by the score.

 Shapovalov was already struggling to hold serve in the third game, when he faced two break points.              

In game 5 two double faults resulted in two further break points. However, Shapovalov, mixing up power and delicacy, alias first services and dropshots. managed to emerge from trouble.

To sum up, the first 6 games had gone with serve, though Zverev had denied access, whereas Shapovalov had  had to save four break points.

Zverev earned three break points in the seventh, after scything an extraordinary backhand volley on the stretch. And this time Shapovalov did not succeed in bouncing back.

A higher first serve percentage – 72%, including 7 aces – and more effective returning granted Zverev the first set.  As well as a predominance in the scarce longer rallies.

Often does the wind change direction at the start of a second set, but Shapovalov insisted on overly indulging in dropshots, resulting in predictability, and lost his service in the first game.

When he faced a break point in the fifth game, after leading 40 15, it seemed as if he was about to throw in the towel. Instead he threw in a backhand passing shot, nimbly flicked with his wrist, and held on.

Back on serve – just a few minutes later, so rapidly did Zverev’s service games whizz past – he saved 5 more break  points with flashes of talent, forays to the net, winning forehands  from all positions.

The match seemed to be edging towards the closing credits, when Zverev was serving for the match at 54.  But never write off panache in tennis. After an overall erratic performance, Shapovalov netted a forehand passing shot, which would have earned him a break point and an assumedly last chance. In turn Zverev netted a match point, suddenly tightened up and ended up dropping his serve, when Shapovalov won a humanly inexplicable rollercoaster point ultimately scooping up a ball from under the net and steering it past his opponent.  

Could the plot take a different twist?

Shapovalov, who had seemed fired up after grabbing the break, abruptly deflated and disappointed expectations by losing his service to love.

Serving a second time for the match, Zverev faltered once more and faced his second break point in the match, which would have meant tie break and a leap into the unknown.

His most formidable weapon, his serve, picked up again and just in time. Three thundering first serves ushered him into the round of 16, where he will be facing Francisco Cerundolo, a resilient winner of Tommy Paul in three sets.

Continue Reading

ATP

Andrey Rublev Clashes With Umpire During Madrid Open Win

Published

on

Andrey Rublev says two decisions made by the umpire during his third round match at the Madrid Open were ‘wrong’ with the points going against him.

The world No.8 clashed with official Adel Nour during his 7-6(10), 6-3, win over Alejandro Davidovich Fokina. It began seven games into the match when a shot from the Spaniard was called out which prompted him to immediately challenge. Then after some confusion, the umpire stated that the shot was in but decided to award the point to Fokina instead of replaying it. A decision that prompted an angry response from Rublev who demanded a replay but officials were unable to do so.

In the second set, a similar situation occurred when a Rublev return was initially called out before the umpire ruled it in. However, the official decided to issue a replay instead of giving the Russian the point. 

“I mean I felt it was wrong because in the first set was exactly the same situation and I told the referee, I agree that yes I couldn’t make it, I hit it out,” The Express quoted Rublev as saying afterwards.
“But the referee called out earlier than I hit [it]. And then second set, the same situation but the referee called it also later than Alejandro hit and the referee told me no, but he was in the position that he could make it. And I say yes but he was trying to make it and he missed it and then it was out.”
“Exactly the same two situations and both of them in my situation, he gave the point to Alejandro and in Alejandro’s situation, we replayed the point.”

Controversy aside, Rublev has now won back-to-back matches in the Tour for the first time since February when he was disqualified from the Dubai Tennis Championships for unsportsmanlike conduct. After that incident, he launched a successful appeal to the ATP who ruled the penalty as ‘disproportionate’ and returned his rankings points and prize money. However, a fine of nearly $30,000 was upheld. 

Rublev currently has a win-loss record of 17-8 so far this season. In Madrid, he will play Tallon Griekspoor in the fourth round. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending